First mathematical analyses was in fact achieved having fun with detailed analytics such as for instance the brand new reliability of the actions, suggest results and percent.

To choose which subscale will be included in the regression study, a correlation anywhere between every dimensions off sexting and its own subscales is actually used. One notably associated sext span subscale are included in the regression to determine whether or not it predicts this new subscales of one’s sexting desire survey (Intimate motives, Looks Picture Reinforcement, Instrumental/Enraged Explanations) and sexting decisions.

Subsequently, i used linear regression between the Social networking Dependency and you may sexting facets to evaluate all of our theory, consistent with the literary works [eleven,45,46,47], you to definitely an advanced level of dependency predict increased better desire to help you sext.

In the long run, to complete new model and you may be sure if your behavioural/psychological problems and the defensive method got a role in the sexting, i held separate linear regressions involving the internalizing/externalizing subscales out of Youthfulness/Adult Notice Report, Factor step one and you can Foundation dos away from REM-71 and you can SBQ, SMQ, Sq. The analyses were conducted using SPSS träffa Kambodjanska kvinnor application (Adaptation 21.0, IBM, Armonk, Ny, USA).

3.step 1. Sexting Reasons, Behavior and you can Span

As regards the descriptive analyses concerning sexting motivations and sexting behavior, males have a higher score in almost all sexting dimensions except sexual purposes in which females have a slightly higher score (Table 1). However, conducting several ANOVAs we found that the only significantly different dimension is that of sexting behaviors where males have a higher score (SBQ score: female M = 33.8; male M = 36.5, p < 0.05,>

In addition, ANOVAs were conducted between males and females on sexting expectations. The results show a significance for two subscales of the Sexpectancies Questionnaire: negative expectations about sending sexts ( p < 0.001,>

The correlation analyses between the SMQ, SBQ and SQ have shown the results summarized in Table 2. Briefly, positive expectations of sending are strongly related to all dimensions of sexting, motivational and behavioral (respectively: p < 0.001>

Consistent with the study of Currin , we conducted regressions between SMQ, SBQ as regressors and SQ as a predictor. The detailed results in Table 3 show that sexting behavior is predicted only by positive expectations of sending ( p < 0.001,>

The check for multicollinearity in every regression in the present paper was conducted by examining the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF). Conventionally, as suggested by Cohen and O’Brien , VIF values greater than 4–10 generally indicate severe multicollinearity. Our results are VIF < 3,>

3.2. Social media Dependency and you may Sexting

Regarding data for the social media dependency (female: Meters = fourteen.0 and you may DS = 5.59; male: M = twelve.8 and DS = 5.10), the brand new ANOVA anywhere between males and females don’t inform you any mathematically significant difference between them teams.

To put it briefly, you’ll be able to claim that a higher level away from social mass media habits may cause a whole lot more desire so you’re able to sext and participate more frequently for the sexting choices.

3.step three. Internalizing/Externalizing Issues, Protective Strategy and you may Sexting

As regards the descriptive analyses on Youth/Adult Self Report and REM-71, the only statistically significant differences between males and females are given below. It emerges that females have higher levels in internalizing scales on youth/adult self-report ( p < 0.001,>

Secondly, we wanted to test our hypothesis that immature defensive strategies correlated with a more problematic type of sexting, such as instrumental/aggravated or body image reinforcement. To do this, we considered the two factors of REM-71 in correlation to each dimension of sexting motivations and behaviors. Correlation analysis found no significant relationship between sexting and factors 1 and 2 of REM-71. For this reason, from an exploratory perspective, we decided to investigate the individual subscales of REM-71, maintaining a more conservative p -value ( p < 0.01).>